An essay on criticism analysis needs to talk about criticism of something in the book that is being analyzed. An essay on criticism analysis focuses its attention on disagreeing with the theme of the book or the thinking of the characters in the book. The writer of the analysis needs to have a clear understanding of the flow of the book, in order to be able to criticize the book more effectively. To write a successful essay on criticism analysis, the theme of the book should be clear to the writer, who should be able to explain it to the reader and give valid reasons as to why he/she is criticizing it. Criticism essays do not need much effort in writing them because all that is needed is for the writer to read the book and just argue against it, and therefore it is easy to develop such an essay. Not much opposition may be experienced from the reader because all that the writer does in analyzing the book is give a different view of what the book talks about. If the reader thinks otherwise, in this case the opposition would be referred to the writer of the book, rather than the person analyzing it. This is what makes it an easy thing to do. Writing an essay on criticism analysis can therefore be said to be not only simple but fun as well. However, the writer of an essay on criticism analysis needs to have a proper understanding of the book to avoid contradictions.
For example, 'An Essay on Criticism' frequently refers to nature as the ultimate guide for writers and critics. 'First follow nature,' Pope explains, emphasizing that this act is where real understanding begins. Like much of the poem, this was a central theme not only in Pope's work, but in the work of many poets and critics writing the 18th century.
-THE END-Alexander Pope's poem: An Essay on Criticism
wrote An Essay on Criticism shortly after turning 21 years old in 1711. While remaining the speaker within his own poem Pope is able to present his true viewpoints on writing styles both as they are and how he feels they should be. While his poetic essay, written in heroic couplets, may not have obtained the same status as others of his time, it was certainly not because his writing was inferior (Bate). In fact, the broad background and comprehensive coverage within Pope's work made it it one of the most influential critical essays yet to be written (Bate). It appears that through his writing Pope was reaching out not to the average reader, but instead to those who intend to be writers themselves as he represents himself as a critical perfectionist insisting on particular styles. Overall, his essay appears to best be understood by breaking it into three parts.